|
Download PDFOpen PDF in browserThree-Valued Paraconsistent Logics with Subclassical Negation and Their ExtensionsEasyChair Preprint 556449 pages•Date: May 20, 2021AbstractWe first prove that any [conjunctive/dis\-jun\-c\-ti\-ve/implicative] 3-valued pa\-ra\-con\-sis\-tent logic with subclassical negation (3VPLSN) is defined by a unique \{modulo isomorphism\} [conjunctive/dis\-jun\-c\-ti\-ve/implicative] 3-va\-lu\-ed matrix and provide effective algebraic criteria of any 3VPLSN's being {\em subclassical\/}$|$being {\em maximally\/} pa\-ra\-con\-sis\-tent$|$having no (inferentially) consistent non-subclassical extension implying that any [co\-n\-j\-un\-c\-ti\-ve/disjunctive]$|$co\-n\-j\-u\-n\-c\-ti\-ve/``both disjunctive and \{non-\}subclassical''/``refuting {\em Double Negation Law\/}''$|$``co\-n\-j\-un\-c\-ti\-ve/disjunctive subclassical'' 3VPLSN ``is subclassical if[f] its defining 3-valued matrix has a 2-valued sub\-mat\-rix''$|$``is \{pre-\}ma\-ximally paraconsistent''$|$``has a theorem but no consistent non-sub\-clas\-si\-cal extension''. Next, any disjunctive/implicative 3VPLSN has no proper consistent non-clas\-si\-cal disjunctive/ax\-i\-o\-ma\-tic extension, any classical extension being disjunctive/axiomatic and relatively axiomatized by the ``{\em Resolution\/} rule''/``{\em Ex Contradictione Qu\-o\-d\-li\-bet\/} axiom''. Further, we provide an effective algebraic criterion of a [subclassical] ``3VPLSN with lattice conjunction and di\-s\-j\-u\-n\-c\-t\-i\-on'''s having no proper [consistent non-classical] extension but that [non-]inconsistent one which is relatively axiomatized by the {\em Ex Contradictione Qu\-o\-d\-li\-bet\/} rule [and defined by the product of any defining 3-valued matrix and its 2-valued submatrix]. Finally, any disjunctive and conjunctive 3VPLSN with classically-va\-lu\-ed connectives has an infinite increasing chain of finitary extensions. Keyphrases: extension, logic, matrix Download PDFOpen PDF in browser |
|
|